|
|
|
Spiritual Authority Have you ever offered what you thought was an excellent idea, only to be met with those famous words; "We've always done it this way!" or perhaps with the second most famous quote, "We tried that before?" You may not have given it much thought, but these answers have a kind of authority behind them. It is the authority of tradition. It may not seem like a very powerful authority, but it probably holds sway over us more often than any of the other kinds of authority. Today, I would like to dig a little deeper into this idea of authority, with an emphasis upon how it is applied in a spiritual way. The religious leaders of Jesus day asked him; By
what authority doest thou these things? and who gave thee this authority?
Matthew 21:23. Jesus
did what He often did with those that should have known the answer to their
question even before they asked. He answered the question with a question in
verses 24 and 25. Jesus said I also will ask you
one thing, which if ye tell me, I in like wise will tell you by what authority I
do these things. The baptism of John, whence was it? from heaven, or of men?
This caused them to bite their tongue in silence, not because they did not know
the answer, but because to admit the truth would have been to declare Jesus the
Son of God with power! We may rightly insist that it is very important to know
by what authority something is done or said. Failure to determine valid
authority results in confusion and bondage. I am going to discuss six kinds
of authority. There may be more kinds of authority than those that I am offering
to you. You may call them by different names, and you may add or subtract from
the number given. Just keep in mind that there is a serious principle involved
in the question of authority. It states that "Every
command or action issues from some kind of authority and to confuse the
authority or to follow improper authority leads to error" The six kinds of authority in my
scheme of things are IMPERIAL, VERACIOUS,
DELEGATED, STIPULATIVE,
CUSTOMARY and SUBSTITUTIONAL. The first,
IMPERIAL authority,
is defined as "The right to rule and prescribe because of Superior
position”. In the
secular realm, we would think of the king in a monarchy, or perhaps the people
themselves in a pure democracy. In
spiritual reality, only GODHEAD is Imperial Authority. Psalm 24:1 sets for the truth that The earth is the LORD'S, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein. Psalm 103:19 The
LORD hath prepared his throne in the heavens; and his kingdom ruleth over all. Dan 2:21 And
he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: It should be clear to any
reasonable person that if one should fear the earthly king because he has the
power of life and death in his earthly kingdom that we should much more
recognize the absolute authority of God when once we acknowledge that God
exists. He has the authority anyway, but its nice (and profitable for us) to say
so. Godhead rules because He is Godhead. All who oppose this rule also
opposes the one who rules and must bear the consequences. This truth would
require a lengthy apologetic before the unbeliever, but for the Trumpeter
readers, I trust we may assume agreement on this kind of authority. The second kind of authority we
may call VERACIOUS.
I did not say "VOR-acious", which means to be insatiable and is
sometimes used to describe my appetite, but I said "VER-acious", which
means the authority of TRUTH. In
the area of morality there is a axium which says “a true principle violated
will lead to evil on the part of the violator” In the secular realm, we
would think of The Law as veracious. By Law we mean the standard by which men
are required to live if they would avoid the evil consequences. In the spiritual
realm the Bible, as the Word of God is the only veracious authority. The force
of this kind of authority is actually an ultimatum, "Follow these
principles and you will discover truth. Disregard them and you will wander in
error." John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. The Son is Veracious Authority. John 17:17 Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. The Word is Veracious. 1 John 5:6 And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth. The Spirit is veracious. Psa 119:151 Thou
art near, O LORD; and all thy commandments are truth. The Law
is veracious. Please meditate upon what I am going to say, and understand
the implications. No one except
Godhead has Imperial or Veracious authority in the ultimate and spiritual sense.
All that men can do is acknowledge these kinds of authority, and try
always to conform to them in how we live and in what we say. The third kind of authority is DELEGATED.
This is a very important and powerful kind of authority. By it men are permitted
to speak in the Name of the Lord! By it the Gospel is delivered to the heathen
world. By it we become Ambassadors for Christ. Anyone who claims to have this
kind of authority may prove it by showing its origin from the Imperial source.
This represents a "chain of command". Control and limitation to
delegated authority for the Christian is in Veracious authority. In the secular
realm, this would probably be best illustrated by reference to the policing
agencies and in ambassadorial positions. Police are granted the authority
to enforce the Law. In order to be successful in a court of law, they must show
that their actions conformed to the law of the land, and may not act upon their
own idea about what is legal or illegal. Failure to limit police action to that
authorized by law results in a renegade “police state”. Likewise, if you
showed up at the American Embassy in France and said you were there to represent
the United States of America as an Ambassador, you would be required to show by
documentation that you were indeed "authorized" to do so. Also, you
would be limited in your authority according to the power "delegated"
to you. Under no circumstances could you speak contrary to your originating
authority. Anything that you would say that was contradictory to the purposes of
your government would be considered null and void, and you would be recalled for
correction or reassigned to Northern Iceland. Heb 13:17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you. (See also Rom. 13:1-7, I Pet. 2:11-20, 3:13-17, 4:12-16) The thing to remember here is that although delegated
authority is a real and powerful authority, it is always subject to Imperial
and Veracious authority. Also important is for the one exercising this
authority to realize that it may be challenged on that basis. Say for instance
someone says that they are some kind of Supreme Pontiff, and therefore entitled
to speak ex cathedra pronouncements that
are to be received as if God spoke. Such
pronouncements may only be accepted if they can be verified according to
Veracious truth. This is not complicated, but it is often ignored because we are
accustomed to such things as Papal pronouncements which people sometimes receive
as if they came from God. This kind of authoritarianism is at work when a
delegated authority tries to settle a principle of truth that only Veracious
authority can settle. In reality, true authority is destroyed in this manner.
More often than not in Catholicism, conflicts are settled by Papal decree when
they should be settled by the Word of God. Then
Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than
men Acts 5:29
In the true Church of Jesus Christ, the lowest and newest believer may
stand against the entire Church and the world when they stand true to the Word
of God! The fourth kind of authority is STIPULATIVE.
This is authority determined by stipulation and convention.
"Constitution" "By Laws" and other rules "agreed to be
followed". Oddly enough, a great deal of the activities carried out in the
Church fall under this kind of authority rather than either Veracious or
Delegated. This may bother some, but I must honestly declare that just because
we do some things as a group and with unanimous agreement does not christen it a
commandment. Let us say for instance that we agree to meet every Sunday morning
at 11:00 A.M. at a certain place for prayer, fellowship, preaching, communion,
etc. We need to know the authority behind what we do. One the one hand the
commandment that we love one another, that we fellowship with one another, that
we celebrate communion, and that we carry out the commission of the Lord to
preach the Gospel may all be clearly founded upon Veracious authority. But the
limitation as to where and when we function as the “Church” along with a
host of other qualifications may well fall within the "stipulative"
category. This is important to know, so that we do not take upon
ourselves more power than God has "delegated" to the Church. Stipulative
authority is real authority, but it is only binding upon those who have
agreed to follow it. If one is part of a local expression of the Body of Christ,
and they agree to meet at 2:00 in the morning on Thursdays because that is the
most convenient time for them (Don’t ask why, just get the main point), then
all who have agreed should make every effort to participate according to their
commitment. But when someone fails to show up for some reason, it is important
also to realize that they have not violated the Veracious authority of the
Word of God, but only the Stipulative authority of the group. Notice the stipulation made in Gen.
29:18 And Jacob loved Rachel; and said, I
will serve thee seven years for Rachel thy younger daughter.
Now this is a perfectly valid and binding authority at work. Jacob could
have said three years, or four, or eleven.
Each would have been valid if agreed to by both parties. To accept
or reject the terms would possibly cause some reaction such as anger or joy, but
no Veracious command would be broken in either case.
Do you see what I am saying? All authorities are real but they are not
all of equal weight. Stipulative
authority is optional, until you stipulate. Then it is binding according to the agreement. If Jacob had
decided after three years that it was a bad deal and pulled out of it, he may
very well have made Laban mad. He may even have suffered some consequences
because of it. But he would not thereby certainly be sinning before God. This story of Jacob and Rachel
also supply the Scriptural illustration for the fifth kind of authority, CUSTOM.
Also called "Tradition". It
may be defined as "The power to determine social decorum by virtue of
social veneration acquired through the prestige of Time and Repetition" Or
simply "We always did it this
way!" Jacob worked seven years for Rachel, and expected Laban
to honor that which was done under the authority of "Stipulation". But
Laban now brings into play another authority, that of Custom, which I remind you
once again is a real authority provided one is justly bound by it.
Laban says in Gen 29:26
It must not be so done in our country, to
give the younger before the firstborn. WOW! What a jolt!
What can Jacob say? "I rebuke you Devil!" No he cannot
say that because the authority of Custom is a very powerful and legitimate
authority. But it is not equal
toVeracious authority. But we ignore it at our own peril. I spent two years in
Japan. When entering a Japanese home, it is required that the shoes be removed
first. That practice was not as common in America in the early fifties as it is
becoming today but to violate it in Japan at that time was to insult the host
family. Again, what about Customary authority in the Church?
Since this article is getting too long, let me simply say that a great
deal of what we take to be commandment from God is often nothing more than
Custom or Tradition. It is O.K. that we follow Custom.
Custom, or tradition if you will can be very good. But it is not
commandment. It is not necessarily Veracious. We err when we grant our
Customs the status of Veracious authority. We err when we accuse people of sin
who have merely violated our customs. This
we must not do. Jacob was not happy with the situation, but he acted wisely. Please read Mark
7:1-13 Quoted below. Jesus
did not say it was wrong to wash your hands before you eat. He did not say it
was wrong to dedicate money to God. What
he said was that these people got their authorities mixed up. They took
traditions, put them in the place of commandments from God and then took the
commandments of God and threw them out. It
is important to know the authority for what we do and say! Our last authority we call FUNCTIONAL.
Also called "Substitutional". Students
accept the authority of the teacher until they know the truth for themselves.
This is Functional authority. A classic example in Scripture is the woman at the
well. She had an encounter with the Lord that entrusted to her some important
information that her fellow townsmen did not have. She wanted to share it with
them and she did. But notice in John 4:42,
after they met Jesus in person And (they)
said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have
heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the
world. I had to wait until I was a teacher myself to appreciate
the implication of what happened. Reading those lines, one almost feels sorry
for the woman. She is like Rodney
Dangerfield, she gets no respect. But wait a minute. She may not have realized
it at the time but what greater joy is there for a teacher than to have the
student grasp what is taught? And when one teaches the Word of God, and the
students come to a knowledge of the Lord, and understand Him to be the Savior of
the World. (I must stop writing here and praise God!) He has allowed us to be a
part of His great plan of redemption. We speak as delegated representatives of
the Kingdom of God. We speak the Words of God by the Spirit of God. People are
born again because of what we teach them. Wonderful Lord! Thank you for
including us. (See the Aug. 1997 Article
“Heavenly Horticulture” in the Trumpeter
Archives) I leave you with these few thoughts. (1) Settle matters
of Spiritual truth by the Word of God, and no other authority.
(2) Never attempt to raise any of the last four kinds of authority to the
level of Imperial or Veracious truth. It is blasphemy to do so. (3) Honor all
authority given to men, but only within the limits granted to that kind of
authority. (4) Teach your children the relative importance of each kind of
authority, and be sure to let them know which one is behind the orders you issue
when you demand their obedience. (They will think you the wisest of parents). And now, by the authority granted unto me by the editor, I sovereignly declare this to be; THE END
Hayden Notes: EX
CATHEDRA in
Church history is a Latin phrase meaning “From the Seat” or “From the
Chair” and has reference to decrees that a Bishop makes while functioning in
his official capacity. Hence the English word Cathedral, “the place of the
seat”. A natural progression of this doctrine is the dogma of “Papal
infallibility”. You should know too that the doctrine of Papal infallibility
does not teach that the Pope is himself infallible, but only that when he speaks
Ex Cathedra, from his chair, upon matters of faith and morals he is protected by
God from error. The difficulty with this doctrine is that one cannot challege
such decrees with the Word of God since church tradition is taken to be of
sufficient value to equal the Word of God. I
quote from the latest CATECHISM
OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
approved by Pope John Paul II. “As
a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation
is entrusted, ‘does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from
the holy Scriptures alone. Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and
honoured with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence.’" “The
task of interpreting the Word of God authentically has been entrusted solely to
the Magisterium of the (Roman Catholic) Church, that is, to the Pope and
to the bishops in communion with him. “ Mark
7:1-13 Then came together unto him the Pharisees, and certain of the scribes,
which came from Jerusalem. And when they saw some of his disciples eat bread
with defiled, that is to say, with unwashen, hands, they found fault. For the
Pharisees, and all the Jews, except they wash their hands oft, eat not, holding
the tradition of the elders. And when
they come from the market, except they wash, they eat not. And many other things
there be, which they have received to hold, as the washing of cups, and pots,
brazen vessels, and of tables. Then the Pharisees and scribes asked him, Why
walk not thy disciples according to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread
with unwashen hands? He answered and said unto them, Well hath Esaias prophesied
of you hypocrites, as it is written, This people honoureth me with their lips,
but their heart is far from me. Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for
doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the commandment of God, ye
hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such
like things ye do. And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of
God, that ye may keep your own tradition. For Moses said, Honour thy father and
thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death: But ye
say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a
gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free. And ye
suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother; Making the word of
God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many
such like things do ye. |